Abstract

At this historical moment, the urban planning and design professions are confronted with the twin challenges of unprecedented rapid urbanization on the one hand, and declining post-industrial regions on the other. In this environment, there are many different and often conflicting ideas about urban heritage and its relevance for contemporary urban planning and design. In this paper, we look for commonalities and a way forward from among a range of competing urban design models. We examine the illustrative case study of the geography and landscape of Detroit, USA. We consider seven contemporary urban planning and design ideals that dominate the contemporary planning and design discourse and their different views of the past and urban heritage in relation to the approaches in Detroit. From these, we draw a synthesis approach, making several recommendations and observations with a focus on the capacities of so-called “placemaking” approaches. In this paper, urban heritage is understood and examined as contributing a pattern of infrastructure that provides a helpful supportive framework, and (importantly) a set of structural limitations (e.g., historic plot boundaries), that can serve as a generative resource for new urban planning and design. We conclude that the necessary framework for democratic participation and opportunity within urban space can be provided most directly by leveraging the assets of urban heritage.

Highlights

  • In an age of rapid social, cultural, and economic globalization, the world is currently experiencing a historically unprecedented rate of urbanization [1]

  • We examine here the option of using urban planning and design based upon local urban heritage

  • The second step, which is beyond the scope of this paper, is to example specific tools and methods for doing so, here the multidisciplinary field of urban morphology as reviewed in this paper offers potentials for studying and analyzing the city as a system of relations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In an age of rapid social, cultural, and economic globalization, the world is currently experiencing a historically unprecedented rate of urbanization [1]. Some reformers point to historic models of urbanism that have been superseded by modern urban development but are once again advanced as viable solutions for contemporary social, economic, and environmental problems, where it is argued that modern planning and design have failed. Most recently, these ideas have been reflected in the “New Urban Agenda” outcome agreement of the United Nations’ Habitat III conference, which. With other cities, and to improve the local quality of life

Vacant historic buildings andand properties in central photo by by authors
Key Differences within Existing Competing Urban Planning and Design Paradigms
Million
Campus
Limitations on Heritage
Opportunities in a “Systems Approach” to Heritage
A New Way Forward
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call