Urban girls, internet use, and accessing health information

Abstract

Background: With the burgeoning growth of the Internet, many have raised concerns over whether and how underserved populations might be included in the Information Revolution. This study examines how urban adolescent girls access the Internet and whether it is a viable source for health information.Methods: During Fall 1999 in New York City, 176 girls completed an anonymous survey where half were from a private high school (N = 86) and the other half were patients at a health clinic serving ethnically diverse and disadvantaged youth (N = 90). Data were analyzed to provide information on how urban girls use the Internet.Results: Internet use was widespread; 99% of the high school and 83% of the clinic girls said they used this medium (p < .001). On frequency, 32% of high school girls compared to 13% of the clinic girls used the Internet 6–7 days/wk (p < .001). Among the high school girls, 30% indicated that they used the Internet less than 30 min/wk and another 18% reported using the Internet more than 5 hrs/wk. Among clinic girls, 51% used the Internet less than 30 min/wk while 9% reported more than 5 hrs/wk. Comfort levels differed with 20% of the high school compared to 10% of the clinic girls reporting “extreme” comfort using the Internet (p < .001).Urban girls accessed the Web from multiple locales. Almost all (98%) of the high school girls compared to 45% of the clinic girls reported that they used the Internet from home (p < .001). Most high school girls (82%) used the Internet at school compared to 63% of the clinic girls currently in school (p < .05). More clinic girls used the Internet at another family member's house (28% vs. 14%, p < .05). Similar percentages of high school and clinic girls used the Internet at a friend's house (46%), the library (31%), or a community center (3%).With similar rates among high school and clinic girls, 44% reported that they had tried to get health information from the Web. Of these (N = 74), 50% said that they got information on different diseases, 43% on diet/nutrition, 34% on fitness/exercise, 26% on sex, 24% on alcohol/drug abuse, 20% on mental health, 14% on medicines, 12% on violence among peers, 10% on parenting, 8% on violence among dating partners, 7% on tobacco and smoking, 7% on emotional or physical abuse, 3% on sexual abuse, and 1% on illness support groups. Clinic girls were more likely to have tried to get information on sex (p < .001) and parenting (p < .001) from the Web. Many girls (59%) indicated that it was “very” or “extremely” worthwhile to have general health information on the Web, with no significant differences between high school and clinic girls. As well, 71% and 62% said it was “very” or “extremely” worthwhile to have access to contraceptive and diet/nutrition information, respectively.Conclusions. High school girls, as anticipated, were technologically savvy. Somewhat surprising, however, were the clinic girls' high levels of Internet use and access. Significant differences revealed that the high school girls were more on-line than clinic girls, but clinic girls were still using the Web frequently. A considerable number or urban girls had tried to get a range of health information from the Internet. This study offers promising statistics on how urban adolescent girls are accessing and using the Internet, especially for health information.