Abstract

The authors aim to evaluate the relevance of ‘urban bias’ and ‘rural bias’ to the Chinese case. They present empirical evidence on the nature and extent of differentiation in rural‐urban living standards, examine the political basis of relevant economic policies and investigate the relationship between these policies: both the changes in labour productivity in each sector and the inter‐sectoral savings transfers. Both ‘urban’ and ‘rural bias’ hypotheses illuminate certain dimensions of Chinese development strategy. But the realities of rural‐urban relations have been complex, and analysis must be supplemented by a focus on the divide between state and society, and the question of ‘state bias’.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.