Abstract

In Michael Lipton's book Why People Stay Poor it is argued that urban bias generates needlessly slow and inequitable growth in less developed countries. This paper focuses on some part of this argument and tests it by cross-sectional multiple regression analyses. For the sixties and seventies it is demonstrated that countries suffering from urban bias, i.e., operationally from a large disparity between agricultural and non-agricultural incomes, did indeed grow more slowly than nations suffering from less urban bias. A causal interpretation of this relationship is favored in this paper. It depends on the assumption that rural-urban income disparities largely result from political and administrative decisions which interfere with allocative efficiency.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.