Abstract
Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) computations for an idealized electronic system are considered. Comparison is made between new Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA) measurements and finite volume predictions involving nine turbulence models. Zero, one and two equation models are tested. Some of these utilize zonal methods and one, non-linear eddy viscosity relations. For velocity components, reasonable agreement is found between measurements and predictions. Overall, the zonal models gave an average error of just less the 15% when compared to velocity measurements. The measurements have an estimated ±5% error. The turbulence models are found to give dramatically different turbulence intensities. These, in turn, give significant variations in the predicted temporal behaviour. Unlike, as suggested by measurements, predicted unsteady flow component amplitudes are found negligible relative to stochastic turbulent components. For velocities, the accuracy of the standard k– ε model is found worse (by around 4%) than that of a simple mixing length model. Results suggest the former is excessively diffusive. Overall, the zonal models show greatest accuracy. However, for intensities, even these predictions differ significantly (on average 28%) from measurements.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
