Abstract

Intercropping advantage occurs only when each species has adequate time and space to maximize cooperation and minimize competition between them. A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years between 2013 and 2014 to investigate the effects of maize and soybean relay strip intercropping systems on the uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. The treatments included “40:160” (T1, maize narrow and wide row spacing of 40 and 160 cm, where two rows of soybean with a 40 cm row were planted in the wide rows. The area occupation ratio of maize and soybean both were 50% of the every experimental block), “80:120” (T2, maize narrow and wide row spacing of 80 and 120 cm, the soybean planting was the same as T1 treatment. The area occupation ratio of maize and soybean were 60% and 40% of the every experimental block), “100:100” (T3, one row of maize and one row of soybean with a 100-cm row. The area occupation ratio of maize and soybean was the same as T1 treatment), sole cropping of maize (CK1, The area occupation ratio of maize was 100% of the every experimental block), and sole cropping of soybean (CK2, The area occupation ratio of soybean was 100% of the every experimental block). The results show that, compared with the sole cropping system (sole maize), the economic yields in T1, T2, and T3 treatments increased by 761, 536, and 458 kg·ha−1, respectively, and the biological yields increased by 2410, 2127, and 1588 kg·ha−1. The uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in T1, T2, and T3 treatments were significantly higher than those in sole crops, and the nutrient advantage is mainly due to nutrient uptake rather than nutrient use efficiency. The land equivalent ratio values in T1, T2, and T3 treatments were 1.43, 1.32, and 1.20, respectively. In particular, the economic and biological yield in T1 treatment exhibited potential as an intercropping pattern.

Highlights

  • Intercropping advantage occurs only when each species has adequate time and space to maximize cooperation and minimize competition between them

  • Soybean yield was significantly affected by the narrow row spacing of maize in the maize–soybean relay intercropping system (Table 1)

  • Soybean yield was significantly decreased by the narrow row spacing of maize in the maize-soybean relay intercropping system, but maize yield was less affected

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intercropping advantage occurs only when each species has adequate time and space to maximize cooperation and minimize competition between them. The uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in T1, T2, and T3 treatments were significantly higher than those in sole crops, and the nutrient advantage is mainly due to nutrient uptake rather than nutrient use efficiency. The world’s agriculture is currently facing a new challenge and the global grain security problem persists[1] Such problems include ever-growing population, cultivated land conversion into urban and industrial construction, and climate change[2]. Intercropping between grasses and legumes results in high yield and promotes the uptake of nitrogen by crops[3,4,13]. Intercropping advantage occurs in only when each species has adequate time and space to maximize cooperation and minimize competition between them.[23] Changing the hierarchies and spatial patterns in plant populations may influence the productivity of the intercropping system

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call