Abstract
AbstractThe toxicities of five systemic fungicides [benomyl, carbendazim, methyl 4‐(2‐ aminophenyl)‐3‐thioallophanate (NF48), thiabendazole and thiophanate‐methyl] and of two non‐systemic fungicides (guazatine and phenylmercury acetate) against Fusarium culmorum were compared on agar plates; their performance as seed treatments was measured by inoculating the shoot bases of wheat seedlings with F. culmorum in pot experiments. The two most effective compounds, benomyl and thiabendazole, and the less effective thiophanate‐methyl, were evaluated in further seed treatment experiments in which leaf sheaths and roots of slightly older plants were infected. The three fungicides protected the first leaf sheath for more than 5 weeks, but thiophanate‐methyl was least effective. Against root disease, they were effective when infection was mild, but only thiabendazole significantly controlled severe infection. Bioautography confirmed that fungicide levels in shoots were greater after benomyl and thiabendazole, than after carbendazim and thiophanate‐methyl treatments, and that concentrations of fungicide after benomyl, carbendazim and thiophanate‐methyl treatments generally declined between 5‐13 weeks after treatment. Thiabendazole produced a second fungitoxic component detectable in plants after 34 days.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.