Upscaling aboveground biomass of larch (Larix olgensis Henry) plantations from field to satellite measurements: a comparison of individual tree-based and area-based approaches

Abstract

ABSTRACT Currently, aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation primarily relies on an area-based approach (ABA), particularly at a large scale. With the advancement of individual tree detection techniques and the availability of multi-platform remotely sensed data, the individual tree-based approach (ITA) provides the potential of accurate and nondestructive fine AGB mapping. However, the performances of the two approaches on upscaling AGB from individual tree to stand level have not been thoroughly investigated. This study conducted the nondestructive AGB estimation using both ITA and ABA and compared the AGB estimates and their spatial uncertainties from an individual tree- to stand-level based on multi-platform LiDAR and Landsat 8 OLI imagery, taking Larix olgensis that is one of the most notable afforestation tree species in northeastern China as an example. Results showed that the point cloud segmentation (PCS) outperformed CHM-based individual tree crown delineation algorithms and obtained the highest accuracy of individual tree AGB estimate (R2 = 0.97, RMSE = 28.58 kg, rRMSE = 21.13%) for the dense larch plantations (about 1265 trees/ha). The plot-level AGB estimate aggregated by all detected trees and its uncertainty based on Monte Carlo simulation were 158.16 and 3.64 Mg·ha−1, respectively. The average pixel-level AGB of larch plantations in Maorshan Forest Farm estimated by ITA and ABA were similar (129.66 v.s 144.38 Mg·ha−1). ITA outperformed ABA in terms of pixel-level AGB accuracy and spatial uncertainty of pixel-level and stand-level AGB estimates. The overestimation of low AGB values, typical in ABA, was effectively eliminated by the ITA. The upscaling frameworks proposed in this study for AGB estimation and spatial uncertainty quantification based on ITA and ABA could be extended to other plantations or uncomplex forests. This study contributes to the accurate quantification of AGB and understanding of the uncertainties in the carbon stock of forest ecosystems at multi-scales.