Uproleselan Added to Cladribine Plus Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) in Patients with Treated Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (TS-AML)

Abstract

Background Treated secondary AML (TS-AML), arising after prior HMA-treated MDS, is associated with very poor prognosis (Complete Remission [CR] rates 15-30% and median Overall Survival [OS] 6-8 months). E-selectin ligand is highly expressed on AML blasts in the leukemic microenvironment and may be a marker of cell survival and resistance to chemotherapy. Exposure of leukemic blasts to HMAs has been shown to increase their expression of E-selectin ligand. Uproleselan is an E-selectin antagonist that overcomes resistance to chemotherapy in AML (Barbier, Nat Commun 2020). We sought to study the combination of low-intensity chemotherapy with Cladribine + LDAC (CLAD/LDAC) with uproleselan to overcome local and microenvironmental resistance and improve outcomes in this difficult subset. Methods This is Phase Ib/II clinical trial (NCT04848974) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and explore the efficacy of Uproleselan added to Cladribine and LDAC. A 3+3 dose-escalation approach was implemented to evaluate 2 different dose levels for Cladribine (CLAD)+ LDAC; each 4-week cycle consists of Uproleselan (at a fixed dose of 800mg intravenously [IV]) added to IV CLAD 5 days (3.75mg/m2 and 5mg/m2; level -1 and 1, respectively) and subcutaneous LDAC twice daily 10 days (15mg, and 20mg; level -1 and 1, respectively) during induction; consolidation was similar except it was with 3-days of CLAD, for up to 6 cycles. Pts aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of TS-AML with adequate organ function, who have not received therapy for their AML were enrolled. TS-AML is defined as AML arising from a previously treated myeloid neoplasm. Presence of the E-selectin ligand was assessed using Flow Cytometry (FC). Results 10 pts have been treated, with 9 pts currently evaluable: 6 (67%) were male and the median age was 68 years (range, 58-80); at the start of therapy, the median bone marrow blasts were 33% (1-78%), median WBC was 2.2x109/L (0.6-20.1), median platelets were 18x109/L (4-305), and median creatinine was 0.98mg/dL (0.67-1.52). Pts had received a median of 1 (1-2) treatments prior to AML transformation. Prior diagnoses were: therapy-related Myelodysplastic Syndrome (t-MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), MDS and MDS/MPN in 3 (33%), 3 (33%), 2 (22%) and 1 (11%) respectively; all had received HMA, 5 (56%) additionally had Ven and 3 (33%) had stem cell transplantation (SCT) prior to enrolling. All pts had unfavorable features by ELN 2017. The most frequent mutations were:SXL1, TP53 and TET2 in 4 pts each (44%), SRSF2 and NRAS in 3 patients each (33%) and SETBP1, RUNX1 and EZH2 in 2 patients each (22%). 6 pts were evaluable for E-selectin ligand expression; the median expression was 59% (42%-95%) and median MFI was 20.5 (13-262). The most common SAEs were ≥ grade 3 neutropenic fever (70%), (including 2 grade 5 events), grade 3 bleeding (10%), and grade 2 thrombosis (5%) (Table 1). There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed on dose levels -1 or 1. Two pts treated on dose level -1 die during the study follow-up due to sepsis within the first 4-weeks during induction. Median time to 0.5x109/L neutrophil and 50x109/L platelets recovery was 29 (17-39) and 38 (33-48) days respectively. The median follow-up is 4+ months. 8 pts were evaluable for response at the time of analysis. The ORR was 62% (5/8), including 2 (25%) PR, 1 (13%) CRi, 1 (13%) CRp and 1 (13%) MLFS. There was a reduction in BM blasts in 6 pts (75%) (Figure 1). 5 pts were taken off protocol due to progression, 2 for death, 1 for allogeneic SCT and 1 continued onto maintenance in remission. The one pt who achieved negative MRD, underwent SCT and is still alive. Median OS and EFS were 4.7 and 1.3 months respectively; 4-month RFS (CRi, CRp, and MLFS) was 67%. The median cycles received was 1 (1-3), median cycles at which the best response was achieved was 1 (1-2). The 4-month OS were 100% and 60% among responders vs. non-responders, respectively (p=0.27), and the 4-month EFS were 50% and 0% respectively (p=0.01). The ORR was 40% (2/5) (p=0.85) and 33% (1/3) (p=0.85) among pts who had prior Ven exposure or prior SCT, respectively. Conclusions The combination of Cladribine + LDAC with Uproleselan was overall well tolerated with few treatment-related AEs. The combination produced an ORR of 62% in a high-risk, refractory population whose prognosis is very dismal. The relationship of E-selectin ligand expression, response to treatment, and outcomes is being analyzed. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal