Abstract

In recent years photogrammetry has become an essential tool in the study of tetrapod footprints. Morphological analyses of footprints are interpretative, thus researchers should use as much information as possible in order to eventually provide an objective conclusion. In this regard, photogrammetry is an extremely helpful tool to avoid potential biases and to better present ichnological data. We review the use of this technique in several Permian and Triassic tetrapod ichnological studies, with considerations on: (1) ichnotaxonomy, (2) track-trackmaker correlation, (3) locomotion and/or behavior, (4) substrate induced effects and (5) preservation of the fossil record and heritage. Furthermore, based on the available three-dimensional (3D) data on Permian and Triassic material, we present a first qualitative interpretation of relative depth patterns and the related functional prevalence (most deeply impressed area) within footprints. We identified three main groups: (1) anamniote, captorhinomorph/parareptile tracks (medial-median functional prevalence), (2) diapsid tracks (median functional prevalence), and (3) synapsid tracks (median-lateral functional prevalence). The use of 3D photogrammetric models brings new light on the tetrapod footprint record, helping to better understand tetrapod communities throughout the late Paleozoic (and the end-Guadalupian and end-Permian extinctions) and the tetrapod recovery during the early Mesozoic.

Highlights

  • Tetrapod footprints are abundant vertebrate remains in upper Paleozoic to lower Mesozoic terrestrial successions (Klein and Lucas, 2010; Lucas, 2019)

  • We review different ichnofossil records in which photogrammetry was used, ranging from the lower Permian (Cisuralian) to the Middle Triassic

  • We identify up to five fields in which photogrammetry is of great use: (1) ichnotaxonomy, (2) track-trackmaker correlations, (3) locomotor and/or behavioral considerations, (4) substrate induced effects, (5) preservation of the fossil record and heritage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tetrapod footprints are abundant vertebrate remains in upper Paleozoic to lower Mesozoic terrestrial successions (Klein and Lucas, 2010; Lucas, 2019). 1935; Peabody, 1948; Heyler and Lessertisseur, 1963; Haubold, 1970, 1971a,b; Gand, 1987) These works often include morphological analyses, usually comprising (1) a graphic interpretation (mostly represented by line and shadow drawings) of footprints and (2) a quantification of the track and trackway proportions by measuring different features (for measurement standards: Haubold, 1971b; Leonardi, 1987). Such analyses form the basis of ichnotaxonomy that follows the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN; International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999). This is why footprints useful for ichnotaxonomy need to be selected by means of morphological preservation, which is the preservation of features derived from the foot anatomy (Marchetti et al, 2019a)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call