Upfront surgery, neoadjuvant, and definitive chemoradiation for clinical T2N0 esophageal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis from the National Cancer Database analysis.

Abstract

103 Background: To compare overall survival (OS) of T2N0 esophageal adenocarcinomas treated with either upfront surgery (US), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR), or definitive chemoradiation (DCR) from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: The NCDB was accessed to identify patients with T2N0 esophageal adenocarcinoma treated between 2004-2013 with either US, NCR, or DCR. NCR and DCR patients were included if they were treated with a radiation dose between 45-50.4 Gy and received chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed against age and tumor length. Results: After PSM, 446 patients (US 98; NCR 203; DCR 145) were included in the analysis. There was no difference in age, tumor length, and grade. Clinical staging in US patients was accurate pathologically in 32.6% of patients. Median and 5 year OS for US, NCR, and DCR patients was 42.5 months and 40%, 48.5 months and 48%, and 22.9 months and 20%, respectively (p<0.001). There was no difference in OS based on response to NCR compared to US. NCR was associated with improved OS in patients with tumors >3 cm compared to US (median OS 43.8 versus 36.4 months; p=0.01). There was a trend toward improved OS with NCR in high grade tumors compared to US. UVA and MVA of OS revealed that DCR was associated with worse survival. Conclusions: Clinical staging for T2N0 esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to remain highly inaccurate. There was no difference in OS between US and NCR, however, improved OS was seen in NCR patients with tumors >3 cm.