Abstract

Background There is a lack of standardisation of reference intervals (RIs) for ferritin across laboratories, particularly for postmenopausal women. Depending on the RI used, there can be more than a 4-fold difference in the upper limit of normal between laboratories, resulting in potential misinterpretation. Methods This retrospective study used a large dataset of blood test results from 25,425 healthy participants aged 18 to 97 over a 7-year period. Exclusion criteria were used to screen out individuals with conditions known to affect iron metabolism or raise ferritin as part of the acute phase response. Distributions were assessed using density and Q-Q plots, and age-banded cut-offs were determined. The non-parametric method was used to establish RIs for sex and age bands. Results For females, 4 age bands were established (18-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60+). For males, 2 bands were identified (18-39 and 40+). Performance against a validation dataset, followed by an expansive validation against an inclusive dataset, demonstrated the robustness of the derived RIs. Conclusion This study addresses the inconsistency in SF RIs by presenting intervals based on demographic parameters. This approach can potentially enhance the accuracy of interpreting SF levels, assisting clinicians in identifying patients requiring further evaluation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call