Abstract

At this year's Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the keyword search "HPV-associated head and neck cancer" resulted in 920 hits-74% of the hits on human papillomavirus (HPV). This underlines the relevance of the topic. The spectrum ranged from validation and separation of the prognostic groups of patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) according to TNM8, to the characterization of new tumor markers and tumor mutational burden for possible de-escalation strategies to avoid toxicity of standard multimodal treatments. It has been shown that the separation of p16-positive OPSCC into Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stagesI andII with the current TNM8 classification without further markers is not sufficiently successful to justify de-escalation strategies. Following publication of the results of the De-ESCALaTE- and RTOG-1016 trials in 2018, which confirm the current standard of care for p16-positive OPSCC, no further phaseIII studies on de-escalation were presented. In apresented prospective phaseII study (NCT02281955), the radiotherapy dose was reduced to cumulative 60 Gy, whereby the simultaneous chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin 30 mg/m2 weekly is not standard of care and could be administered as an alternative to cisplatin cetuximab. Some work dealt with the oral and intestinal microbiota as prognostic markers or their treatment-related changes, particularly under immunotherapy. Modification seems to have apositive impact on the success of therapy. However, robust data are still lacking for the various modified treatments for HPV-associated OPSCC, which are needed before their implementation in daily practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call