Abstract
Within the ReSOLVE framework, the concept of ‘Looping’ materials in an efficient way is a crucial theme to ensure environmental sustainability of circular economy. This paper investigates how current calculation practice of building LCA from the EN 15804/15978 standards affects the global warming potential (GWP) of building designs where material loops have been in focus. In this study, we calculate the environmental potentials of circular building design based on two cases; 1) a building constructed from primarily upcycled materials, and 2) a building constructed with principles of design for disassembly (DfD). Results from the two cases point to the significance of the EN standards’ allocation approach in which a system’s use of recycling/reuse is merited, rather than meriting a system providing recyclable/reusable materials. Hence, the upcycling strategy results in lower GWP, especially from the production stage, whereas the DfD strategy does not realize an environmental advantage within the framework of the EN standards. Results further shows that even though concrete elements are notable components of the DfD building, developing DfD-solutions for these exact elements might not be the preferred focus for optimizing the environmental benefits provided by the building. Instead, DfD focus could be on shorter-lived elements of high benefit potentials.
Highlights
Circular economy has found a great appeal from business as well as research society as a concept for ensuring efficient use of resources
We calculate the environmental potentials of circular building design based on two cases; 1) a building constructed from primarily upcycled materials, and 2) a building constructed with principles of design for disassembly (DfD)
The upcycling strategy results in lower global warming potential (GWP), especially from the production stage, whereas the design for disassembly’ (DfD) strategy does not realize an environmental advantage within the framework of the EN standards
Summary
Circular economy has found a great appeal from business as well as research society as a concept for ensuring efficient use of resources. A comprehensive framework used for classifying circular approaches is presented by the ReSOLVE framework, which covers aspects of Regeneration, Sharing, Optimizing, Looping, Virtualizing, and Exchanging [1]. In the scope of the framework is a focus on the efficiency of resource provision (regenerate, loop) as well as a focus on the efficient use of resources (share, optimize, virtualize, exchange). Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been in use for decades as a tool for documenting the performance of products and services by quantifying the related environmental impacts and resource uses.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.