Abstract

This research is based on the low learning motivation of students in learning rhythmic gymnastics movements. So that the impact on the low student learning outcomes with classical completeness 55.5%. Based on these problems, the solution chosen is to apply the Jigsaw cooperative learning model, because this learning model is a group learning model that can increase student activity. The formulation of the general problem of this research is whether the application of the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model can improve the learning outcomes of rhythmic gymnastics for fifth grade students of SDN 3 Sukajawa. Whereas specifically, whether the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model can improve teacher skills, student activities, and student learning outcomes in learning rhythmic gymnastics in fifth grade students of SDN 3 Sukajawa? The purpose of this study was to improve the quality of learning including teacher skills, student activities and learning outcomes of rhythmic gymnastics for fifth grade students of SDN 3 Sukajawa. This type of research is a classroom action research with two cycles. Each cycle consists of four stages, namely planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. The research subjects were students of class V SDN 3 Sukajawa. Data collection techniques used knowledge tests, performance tests and attitude tests. The results showed that the skills of the first cycle teachers obtained an average score of 70 with good criteria. In the second cycle obtained an average score of 80 with very good criteria. The level of knowledge of the first cycle students obtained an average score of 77.8 with good criteria. Cycle II increased with an average score of 82.4 with very good criteria. The results of student performance in the first cycle obtained an average score of 74.5 while the second cycle obtained an average score of 81.6. The students' attitude test in the first cycle obtained an average score of 76.5, while in the second cycle it obtained an average score of 81.5. The final score in cycle I obtained a score of 70 and in cycle II increased to 85. Completeness of classical learning cycle I was 72.2%, cycle II increased to 83.3%.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call