Abstract
This research compares the conventional audit approach with the automated audit approach in the context of computer-based audit strategies. A comparative quantitative method was employed, using surveys and interviews as data collection techniques. The majority of respondents (68%) preferred the automated audit approach, indicating a significant preference. The analysis revealed that the automated audit approach can reduce dependency on human resources. The independent samples t-test confirmed significant differences between the two audit methods in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. The automated audit method demonstrated higher scores in efficiency and effectiveness. This study suggests adopting the automated audit method as a more modern and efficient approach in auditing practices. Further research, encompassing a broader sample scope and diverse industry variations, is suggested to gain a comprehensive understanding of preferences and factors influencing the acceptance of the automated audit method.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
