Abstract
As pressing needs for exploring molecular interactions in plants soar, conventional sample preparation methods come into question. Though resins used to embed plant tissues have long been assumed to bear no palpable effect on their properties, discrepancies in recent studies exploiting nanoscale microscopy suggest that their impact could be significant at small scales. By juxtaposing the traits of poplar sections prepared with and without embedding, we evaluate the diffusion (penetration depth) of acrylic and epoxy resins commonly used for embedding. Our results unveil critical quantitative differences when probing mechanical properties with a microscale nanoindentation indenter or a nanoscale tip. The latter resolves significant stiffness variations between the compound middle lamellae, the secondary cell wall layers S1 and S2, and the cell corner, not accessible with nanoindentation. Similar observations are drawn from comparing confocal Raman and nanoscale infrared spectroscopy. Our findings shed light on the effect of resin diffusion suggesting acrylic LR White to be the least diffusive for plant cell wall studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.