Unveiling Human Factors: Aligning Facets of Cybersecurity Leadership, Insider Threats, and Arsonist Attributes to Reduce Cyber Risk

Abstract

This qualitative study is a systematic literature review (draws on literature primarily published within the last five years) addresses a comprehensive approach to a crucial but often overlooked aspect of cybersecurity: the human factors underlying insider threats. Attention is focused on the so-called “organizational arsonists” – individuals who willfully seek to adversely impact the organization by inducing anarchy aligned with their own motivations, insiders who purposefully damage their companies using digital methods, someone intentionally causing mayhem within a company, which can be criminal in cyber environments. The purpose of the research is to identify how cybersecurity leadership can effectively detect and mitigate the risks associated with insiders, particularly those exhibiting arsonist-like behaviors. Review uncovering that organizational arsonists can escalate cybersecurity risks substantially, with insider incidents costing organizations an average of $16.2 million per incident. These incidents now represent a persistent challenge, increasing in frequency by 68% over the past year according to the 2022 Insider Threat Report. The findings highlight the necessity of leadership strategies that preemptively recognize and neutralize potential insider threats to improve organizational resilience and security posture. This approach not only informs current cybersecurity practices but also aids in the development of targeted policies and refined regulatory measures. By integrating insights from psychology, criminology, and cybersecurity, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of the human elements influencing insider threats, essential for enhancing both academic knowledge and practical applications in risk management. The results showed a parallel between the motivations of arsonists who set physical fires to the characteristics and motivations of insider threats who exploit organizational vulnerabilities. The impact of this research can be helpful in assisting cybersecurity professionals, leaders who strategize against cyber threats, and risk managers and analysts who understand and mitigate human factors and insider threats. Leaders and executives may use these insights to improve security resource allocation and culture. Policymakers and regulators may use the study’s results to create more nuanced cybersecurity legislation, while academics and students in related disciplines can use it for future research.