Abstract
IN the course of an investigation to determine whether there was a body in the Sutton Hoo ship burial1, chemical analysis has revealed some unusual phosphatic material derived from calcined bone. That this phosphatic material should have persisted after some 1,300 years is of the utmost importance when one considers that the acidic nature of the soil at Sutton Hoo2 (subsoil sand, pH 4.5) does not favour the preservation of skeletal remains. In the whole of the burial deposit, the excavators thought they recognized only one small fragment of bone which they described as unburnt3. This piece, cancellous and brown in colour, was found on top of the largest of the silver dishes in close association with many fragments of wood, bark and iron. From visual examination only, a distinguished anatomist agreed with the excavators; but the opinion of others, based on more detailed examination, was that the fragment was not bone.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
