Abstract

Unusual force constants originating from the local charge distribution in crystalline GeTe and Sb2Te3 are observed by using the first-principles calculations. The calculated stretching force constants of the second nearest-neighbor Sb-Te and Ge-Te bonds are 0.372 and −0.085 eV/Å2, respectively, which are much lower than 1.933 eV/Å2 of the first nearest-neighbor bonds although their lengths are only 0.17 Å and 0.33 Å longer as compared to the corresponding first nearest-neighbor bonds. Moreover, the bending force constants of the first and second nearest-neighbor Ge-Ge and Sb-Sb bonds exhibit large negative values. Our first-principles molecular dynamic simulations also reveal the possible amorphization of Sb2Te3 through local distortions of the bonds with weak and strong force constants, while the crystalline structure remains by the X-ray diffraction simulation. By identifying the low or negative force constants, these weak atomic interactions are found to be responsible for triggering the collapse of the long-range order. This finding can be utilized to guide the design of functional components and devices based on phase change materials with lower energy consumption.

Highlights

  • Phase change materials can exist in at least two different phases, such as a crystalline phase and an amorphous phase, featuring rapid and reversible switching between phases with large property contrasts

  • The overall distributions of the stretching and bending force constants (FCs) are similar for GeTe and Sb2Te3

  • Through analyzing the FCs of GeTe and Sb2Te3 by using the first-principles calculations, we find that the overall characteristics of the stretching and bending FCs are similar for GeTe and Sb2Te3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phase change materials can exist in at least two different phases, such as a crystalline phase and an amorphous phase, featuring rapid and reversible switching between phases with large property contrasts. According to the simple and early-established theoretical considerations, the transition between the amorphous and the crystalline states, such as the “umbrella flip” model [17], has been attributed to rapid crystallization from the intrinsic similarity in atomic arrangements. Their atomic arrangements are not yet clear, which results in poor understanding of the phase exchange mechanism. Several recent theoretical reports strongly suggest that the “umbrella flip” model needs to be reevaluated [1,4,19,20]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call