Abstract

Currently, normal-leafed long-vined and semi-leafless short-vined winter pea cultivars are available commercially. The weed infestation in pea crop stands is affected by both pea growth habit and cropping system. Intercrop compositions of normal-leafed or semi-leafless winter peas and cereals have to be improved in order to combine good weed suppression with high yield performance. Therefore, more knowledge on the weed suppressive ability of normal-leafed and semi-leafless winter pea-cereal intercrops and the underlying factors is needed. In 2009/10 and 2010/11, the normal-leafed winter pea cv. E.F.B. 33 and the semi-leafless cv. James were grown as sole crops and in an intercrop with triticale (40 germinable kernels winter peas + 150 germinable kernels triticale m 2 ) in field experiments in Northern Germany. Six intercrop compositions of each win ter pea cultivar (20, 40 or 60 germinable kernels winter peas + 150 or 75 germinable kernels triticale m 2 ) were examined in 2011/12 and compared to the respective winter pea sole crops. Normal-leafed winter peas had a better weed suppressive ability than semi-leafless winter peas. Intercropping was effective in reducing a weed infestation in semi-leafless pea crop stands, whereas the weed infestation in normal-leafed pea crop stands was comparable between cropping systems or significantly lower in the intercrop. Intercrops with a high triticale sowing density suppressed weeds to a higher extent than those with a low triticale sowing density. The underlying factor of a better weed suppression was a lower PAR transmission to the weed canopy level, whereas a crop-weed competition for nitrogen or water did not sufficiently explain differences in the weed suppressive ability between pea growth habits or cropping systems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call