Abstract

Holoprosencaphly (HPE)—a craniofacial disorder in which the forebrain fails to develop into two hemispheres and the midface does not fully form—is characterized by a broad spectrum of severity. Phenotypes range from very mild midfacial narrowing to cyclopia. Mutations in Sonic hedgehog (SHH) and in SHH signaling pathway members are known to underlie HPE; however, the source of the highly variable craniofacial morphology manifesting in the HPE patient population is not understood. Previous research in a chick model suggests that reduced SHH‐signaling in the brain correlates with a continuous distribution of HPE‐like phenotypes, and that very small modifications in ligand concentration can result in highly heterogeneous morphologies. Here, we are probing the origins of morphological variation in a genetic mouse model. Although humans heterozygous for SHH mutations exhibit the full spectrum of HPE, mice heterozygous for Shh do not exhibit even mild HPE although homozygous mutants are cyclopic. Mice homozygous for mutations in the SHH‐signaling pathway member low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein (Lrp) 2 however exhibit mild to severe forms of HPE, and are therefore a better model for examining sources of variation. LRP2 is an endocytic receptor required to induce proper SHH signaling in the forebrain. We used geometric morphometric analysis to quantify the shape of embryos with sequential, genetic loss of Shh and Lrp2 alleles, and qPCR was used to assess SHH signaling pathway activation. We found that there is no statistically significant difference in shape among wild‐type, Lrp2+/−, Shh+/−, and Lrp2+/−;Shh+/− embryos, while Lrp2−/− and Lrp2−/−;Shh+/− embryos diverged from the group, exhibiting a more narrow midface. Interestingly, there was increased phenotypic variance in Lrp2−/− and Lrp2−/−;Shh+/− embryos in comparison to the other genotypes, with a greater increase in variance seen in the Lrp2−/−;Shh+/− group. Our results support the hypothesis that very slight modifications to SHH pathway activation can yield large amounts of phenotypic variation.Support or Funding InformationThis work is supported by NIH/NIDCR‐R01DE018234, ‐R01DE019638, ‐T32DE730619, ‐F31DE02579001.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.