Abstract

The ever-growing developments in technology to capture different types of image data [e.g., hyperspectral imaging and light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-derived digital surface model (DSM)], along with new processing techniques, have led to a rising interest in imaging applications for Earth observation. However, analyzing such datasets in parallel, remains a challenging task. In this article, we propose a multisensor deep clustering (MDC) algorithm for the joint processing of multisource imaging data. The architecture of MDC is inspired by autoencoder (AE)-based networks. The MDC paradigm includes three parallel networks, a spectral network using an autoencoder structure, a spatial network using a convolutional autoencoder structure, and lastly, a fusion network that reconstructs the concatenated image information from the concatenated latent features from the spatial and spectral network. The proposed algorithm combines the reconstruction losses obtained by the aforementioned networks to optimize the parameters (i.e., weights and bias) of all three networks simultaneously. To validate the performance of the proposed algorithm, we use two multisensor datasets from different applications (i.e., geological and rural sites) as benchmarks. The experimental results confirm the superiority of our proposed deep clustering algorithm compared to a number of state-of-the-art clustering algorithms. The code will be available at [Online]. Available: <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/Kasra2020/MDC</uri> .

Highlights

  • In recent years, we witnessed revolutionary advancements in imaging technologies [1]

  • In terms of overall accuracy (OA), when Convolutional autoencoder (CAE) was applied on hyperspectral image (HSI)+LiDAR, a 10% increase can be observed in comparison to when CAE applied on the HSI alone

  • In Variational AE (VAE) the fusion of HSI and LiDAR-derived digital surface model (DSM) data did not improve the result; in addition, VAE poorly performs in the clustering task compared to all studied approaches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We witnessed revolutionary advancements in imaging technologies (e.g., multi-spectral and hyperspectral imaging) [1]. The number of platforms that can carry different sensors (e.g., unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellites) grew fast [2] These advancements allow users to acquire high-quality information of various aspects (i.e., spectral, spatial, and elevation) of on-ground materials and objects at various spatial scales (from close-range to space) [3]. A hyperspectral image (HSI) contains hundreds of narrow spectral bands (channels), covering the visible and near-infrared (VNR, 0.4 − 1 μm) and shortwave infrared (SWIR, 1 − 2.5 μm) electromagnetic spectrum [4]. In this way, by employing an HSI, users can distinguish, identify, and track different materials and organisms. In the last decades, many studies in Earth science were devoted to the

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call