Abstract
An 82-year-old man with history of dementia and atrial fibrillation (AF) was admitted for sepsis and subsequently developed AF with rapid ventricular response (RVR). Given a recent do not resuscitate (DNR) order, there was disagreement among providers regarding the use of direct current cardioversion (DCCV). This patient case reveals the ethical challenges faced by providers when patients with a DNR order develop unstable AF with RVR and discusses an ethical framework for decision-making regarding DCCV in patients with a DNR order. This case also promotes changes to clinical practice, such as discussing DCCV when discussing code status and replacing DNR with “no cardiopulmonary resuscitation.”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
