Abstract

The relaxation in the calculus of variation motivates the numerical analysis of a class of degenerate convex minimization problems with non-strictly convex energy densities with some convexity control and two-sided $p$-growth. The minimizers may be non-unique in the primal variable but lead to a unique stress $\sigma \in H(\operatorname{div},\Omega;\mathbb{M})$. Examples include the p-Laplacian, an optimal design problem in topology optimization, and the convexified double-well problem. The approximation by hybrid high-order methods (HHO) utilizes a reconstruction of the gradients with piecewise Raviart-Thomas or BDM finite elements without stabilization on a regular triangulation into simplices. The application of this HHO method to the class of degenerate convex minimization problems allows for a unique $H(\operatorname{div})$ conforming stress approximation $\sigma_h$. The main results are a~priori and a posteriori error estimates for the stress error $\sigma-\sigma_h$ in Lebesgue norms and a computable lower energy bound. Numerical benchmarks display higher convergence rates for higher polynomial degrees and include adaptive mesh-refining with the first superlinear convergence rates of guaranteed lower energy bounds.

Highlights

  • This paper analyses the methodology [28, 29] for a class of degenerate convex minimization problems defined in Subsection 1.2 with examples in Subsection 1.3

  • The numerical approximation of the solution to the three model problems in Subsection 1.3 is analysed with the focus (i) on the convergence rate of the lower energy bound (LEB) from Theorem 4.6.a towards the exact energy min E(V ) − LEB and (ii) on the a posteriori error estimate with

  • The a posteriori estimate in Subsection 4.2 motivates an adaptive mesh-refining algorithm for the high-order methods (HHO) schemes that converges in the examples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper analyses the methodology [28, 29] for a class of degenerate convex minimization problems defined in Subsection 1.2 with examples in Subsection 1.3. This extends the a priori results in [15] to methods of higher polynomial degrees. This section starts with common duality tools in convex analysis and further properties of the energy density W , followed by a summary of known results concerning the minimizer u and the stress σ := D W (D u). For any T ∈ T , the norm equivalence in finite-dimensional spaces shows that

The choice τh
CdF f
The choice τ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.