Abstract

This study sought to explore contributory factors of academic dishonesty. Academic dishonesty is being practiced yet little research has been conducted on the subject. Subsequently, this study employed the qualitative approach for in-depth exploration of the factors of academic dishonesty. In this study, focus group discussions were conducted with two groups of participants; university students (N=12) and university teachers (N=08) of The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Participants for this study were recruited through purposive sampling. Three research questions were asked to the participants: Q1) How is academic dishonesty described by students and teachers? Q2) What would be the possible types of academic dishonesty? and Q3) What are the pros and cons of academic dishonesty in the long run? Their responses were audio taped and the collected data were transcribed by following transcription steps provided by Humble (2015). For data analysis, NVivo (12) was utilized and factors were extracted. The prudent findings found that cheating, plagiarism, falsification and failure of system are identified as the most prominent factors. The findings of this study concluded that these factors significantly shape-up academic dishonesty in higher learning institutions. Findings of this study would help educationists to bring about reforms in the educational sector.

Highlights

  • Academic dishonesty is debated as a predominant phenomenon of the day that grabs the attention of every educated and concerned person

  • The current study used a qualitative approach to find out the factors behind academic dishonesty

  • Cheating is the one of the important factors of academic dishonesty that was found after the breakdown of data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic dishonesty is debated as a predominant phenomenon of the day that grabs the attention of every educated and concerned person. Graduate and undergraduate students display a severe problem of misconduct in their workplaces. Using helping material for cheating in exams, manipulation of the assignments, presenting fraudulent data, proxy attendances, false excuses to attain extension for projects are common methods of academic dishonesty adopted by majority of the students. The most conventional and common way of cheating during exams is by using helping material [Pullen, Ortloff, Casey, and Payne (2002); Danielsen, Simon and Pavlick (2006); Choi (2009)]. In order to devise ways to deal with academic dishonesty, educational organizations have opted various ways as a universal explanation of this phenomenon is absent (Eaton, 2017). The expected norms of academic institutes are interrupted by devious acts of corruption, scams, and wrongdoings in academic fields

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call