Unresolved Tensions in the Study of Meaning in Life

Abstract

In an effort to provide some integration to the commentaries in this special issue on existential meaning, this article explores some of the tensions expressed within and across the commentaries regarding how conceptualization and research on meaning should proceed. These tensions include (a) mystery versus science, (b) situational versus global focus, (c) boundaries versus boundlessness, (d) subjective versus objective phenomena, (e) cognitive versus affective aspects, and (f) universal versus culturespecific meanings. Each of these tensions warrants considerable exploration and discussion; future advances in our understanding of existential meaning depend on our successful resolution of these tensions. The commentaries in this special issue on the prospects for advancing our understanding of meaning in life contain many great insights and ideas. Collectively, these commentaries provide much wisdom and many directions for future theory development and empirical research. To provide some integration, I highlight some of the tensions expressed within and across the commentaries. I hope these ideas prove useful in guiding these future endeavors.