Abstract

Abstract. The baffling diversity of runoff generation processes, alongside our sketchy understanding of how physiographic characteristics control fundamental hydrological functions of water collection, storage, and release, continue to pose major research challenges in catchment hydrology. Here, we propose innovative data-driven diagnostic signatures for overcoming the prevailing status quo in catchment inter-comparison. More specifically, we present dimensionless double mass curves (dDMC) which allow inference of information on runoff generation and the water balance at the seasonal and annual timescales. By separating the vegetation and winter periods, dDMC furthermore provide information on the role of biotic and abiotic controls in seasonal runoff formation. A key aspect we address in this paper is the derivation of dimensionless expressions of fluxes which ensure the comparability of the signatures in space and time. We achieve this by using the limiting factors of a hydrological process as a scaling reference. We show that different references result in different diagnostics. As such we define two kinds of dDMC which allow us to derive seasonal runoff coefficients and to characterize dimensionless streamflow release as a function of the potential renewal rate of the soil storage. We expect these signatures for storage controlled seasonal runoff formation to remain invariant, as long as the ratios of release over supply and supply over storage capacity develop similarly in different catchments. We test the proposed methods by applying them to an operational data set comprising 22 catchments (12–166 km2) from different environments in southern Germany and hydrometeorological data from 4 hydrological years. The diagnostics are used to compare the sites and to reveal the dominant controls on runoff formation. The key findings are that dDMC are meaningful signatures for catchment runoff formation at the seasonal to annual scale and that the type of scaling strongly influences the diagnostic potential of the dDMC. Adding discrimination between growing season and winter period was of fundamental importance and easy to implement by means of a temperature-index model. More specifically, temperature aggregates explain over 70 % of the variability of the seasonal summer runoff coefficients. The results also show that the soil topographic index, i.e. the product of topographic gradient and saturated hydraulic conductivity, is significantly correlated with winter runoff coefficients, whereas the topographic gradient and the hydraulic conductivity alone are not. We conclude that proxies for gradients and resistances should be interpreted as a pair. Lastly, the dDMC concept reveals memory effects between summer and winter runoff regimes that are not relevant in spring between the transition from winter to summer.

Highlights

  • Understanding catchment-scale runoff formation and the underlying controls is the key for building hydrological models, which work for the right reasons (Kirchner, 2006), as well as for hydrological similarity assessment (Larsen et al, 1994; Barthold and Woods, 2015) in general.The latter includes what we call “forward” and “backward” classification approaches: forward in the sense of pos-Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.S

  • Prominent forward approaches include for instance hydrological response units (HRUs) (Leavesley, 1973), the concept of hydrology of soil types (HOST) (Boorman et al, 1995), or the topographic index (Kirby, 1975) which describes similarity of points within a catchment with respect to event-scale runoff formation (Beven and Kirkby, 1979)

  • In this study we propose and test dimensionless diagnostic signatures to characterize seasonal runoff formation based on rainfall–runoff data, which shall separate the terrestrial controls on runoff formation from the meteorological forcing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding catchment-scale runoff formation and the underlying controls is the key for building hydrological models, which work for the right reasons (Kirchner, 2006), as well as for hydrological similarity assessment (Larsen et al, 1994; Barthold and Woods, 2015) in general.The latter includes what we call “forward” and “backward” classification approaches: forward in the sense of pos-S. Understanding catchment-scale runoff formation and the underlying controls is the key for building hydrological models, which work for the right reasons (Kirchner, 2006), as well as for hydrological similarity assessment (Larsen et al, 1994; Barthold and Woods, 2015) in general. The latter includes what we call “forward” and “backward” classification approaches: forward in the sense of pos-. The forward classification schemes are strongly modeldependent, which leaves us with questions about conclusiveness and transferability to other landscapes and how to define similarity in catchment response behaviour independently of models

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call