Unraveling the Unusual Pathological Findings of Appendiceal Lesions: A Cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Care Centre in Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Introduction: The appendix, once considered a vestigial structure, is now recognised as a site of diverse pathologies beyond simple appendicitis through a systematic analysis of published literature and case studies. The diagnosis of appendiceal lesions is still a clinical phenomenon and a constant struggle. The gold standard for diagnosing appendiceal lesions, however, is meticulous histopathological examination. Aim: To determine the histopathological distribution of all the appendiceal lesions and to identify the rare and unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens received at a tertiary care Centre. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India for a duration of 10 years, from August 2013 to August 2023. From the histopathological records of 832 appendectomies, 40 specimens with unusual histopathological findings were identified and analysed in this study. Relevant recorded data from all the appendiceal specimens reported during the study period, with special reference to age, sex, and histopathological findings, were retrieved and evaluated retrospectively. Corresponding slides and specimens were reviewed. The data were presented in the form of frequency tables and percentages. The analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0. Results: Out of 832 appendectomy specimens, there were 485 (58.29%) cases of acute appendicitis, 244 (29.33%) cases of chronic appendicitis, 59 (7.09%) cases of subacute appendicitis, and 4 (0.48%) cases of gangrenous appendicitis. Unusual histopathology findings were noted in 40 cases (4.81%). These include 17 cases of appendiceal neuroma, eight cases of Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis, seven cases of Enterobius vermicularis, three cases of Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN), one case of appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumour (NET), one case of Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma (GCA), one case of metastatic squamous cell carcinomatous deposit in the appendix, one case of urothelial rests in the appendix, and one case of appendiceal lipoma. Conclusion: In this study, 4.81% of patients had atypical appendiceal lesions. A complete histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens increases the chances of discovering unusual lesions of the appendix. Ultimately, this comprehensive analysis will contribute to future improvements in clinical management and prognostication, fostering better patient outcomes.