Abstract

We present a pronounced unprecedented surface modification of a crystalline Ge layer under ion irradiation with a Ge ion beam at the energy of 2.5 MeV. Samples were covered by a thin SiN-protection layer to protect from sputtering and surface redeposition phenomena. Under the irradiation conditions, the Ge layer did not become porous as observed for other projectiles and lower energies but develops into a severely uneven morphology with characteristic length scales of several hundred nanometers. The observed roughness monotonically increases with the irradiation doses. We show that this phenomenon is caused neither by the surface erosion effect nor by a non-uniform volumetric expansion. Rather, atomic redistribution in the bulk of the material is the major drive for the uneven surface. Furthermore, the deformation of the Ge layer likely occurs to the largest extent after irradiation, as indicated by the very flat interface around the end-of-range region. The observed morphology modification is discussed based on irradiation-induced plastic flow, coupled with a larger contribution of the electronic component in the ion–solid interactions.

Highlights

  • At even higher ion energies, i.e., in the high energy regime (MeV), much fewer studies on the subject have been reported, which can be partially motivated by decreasing achievable particle doses with increasing energy

  • Using a krypton ion beam at 1.5 MeV at room temperature, Wang and Birtcher have shown the formation of sponge-like structures on the surface of Ge, starting at the dose of ∼7 ⋅ 1014 cm−2.18 Comparably, Steinbach et al used an iodine ion beam at 3 MeV to form porosity on the surface and buried voidrich bands at the projected range of the I ions in Ge.[19]

  • We present an experimental study of the ion irradiation effect on Ge implanted with a broad 2.5 MeV Ge+ ion beam at room temperature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

At even higher ion energies, i.e., in the high energy regime (MeV), much fewer studies on the subject have been reported, which can be partially motivated by decreasing achievable particle doses with increasing energy.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call