Abstract

This paper examines the intricate link between unobservable characteristics of directors on the corporate board and firm performance. It aims to extend the literature on corporate governance and firm strategic performance from the perspective of emerging African economies. A mix of performance measures were used (Tobin Q, return on assets, and share price) and unobservable characteristics were captured as a stochastic element or heterogeneity of observable board characteristics (board activity, gender diversity, size, and independence). The study applied non-linear generalized auto-regressive conditional heteroscedasticity model to examine the data set consisting of 299 firm-year observations from 23 financial firms listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2006 to 2018. Positive skewness and leptokurtic distribution were found for all the variables. Correlation matrix revealed no multicollinearity, as the highest value was 0.2386. Empirical results suggest that unobservable characteristics significantly and positively influence firm performance as measured by return on assets and share price. This is because the coefficient of the lagged-value of the variance scaling parameter is positive and significant at the 1% level. However, with respect to Tobin Q measure, the result was positive but not significant at the 5% level. Implicitly, the result is sensitive to performance proxies. Accordingly, this study concludes that unobservable characteristics drive firm performance. It is recommended that boards and regulators should pay attention to unobservable characteristics.

Highlights

  • The need for effective corporate governance in companies is not unconnected with a financial scandal and eventual collapse of some corporate giants like Enron and WorldCom

  • This paper examines the intricate link between unobservable characteristics of directors on the corporate board and firm performance

  • A mix of performance measures were used (Tobin Q, return on assets, and share price) and unobservable characteristics were captured as a stochastic element or heterogeneity of observable board characteristics

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

There are quite a number of empirical studies on board characteristics or attributes as influencer of firm performance (see Garcia-Martin & Herrero, 2018; Horvath & Spirollari, 2012; Imade, 2019; Nguyen et al, 2017; Pereira & Filipe, 2014). The contribution (2017) reported a positive relationship between of members of the board has been found to firm performance and the number of independent depend on the information processing loads by directors. The study fur- ic professors on the board correlate with perforther notes that the Central Bank of Nigeria’s code mance in the areas of higher information conof corporate governance requires non-executive veyed by stock price and lower CEO compensadirectors to, among other things, have broad ex- tion This performance was attributed to the adperience, integrity, and independent judgment to vising capability. Researches support the fact that emotions, mood, and affect influence performance as they contribute to attitudi-

METHODS
RESULTS
Model Result – Tobin Q as a Performance Measure
Model Result – Share Price
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call