Abstract

Previous interpretations of surface-rock geochemical data from the sheeted-vein tin mineralization in the Emmaville district have been carried out using classical statistics. These investigations revealed low-contrast geochemical patterns of 3 to 5 ppm Sn, supported by 80 to 160 ppm F, block-average contours defining four of the six known mineral occurrences. Principal component scores for the association dominated by F-Li-Rb have defined the same four mineral occurrences. For the prospecting of similar deposits it is highly desirable to improve the data processing techniques to achieve more acceptable geochemical contrasts between anomalous and background levels. Minimum volume ellipsoid (MVE) estimation, a high-breakdown method (capable of accommodating up to 50% outliers) recently developed in robust statistics is applied to a subset of the data from the northeastern part of the Emmaville district. The anomalies related to mineralization in this part of the district are not as well developed compared to those in the west. The data set used in this study consists of 133 observations with 6 elements, namely Cu, Li, Rb, F, As and Sn. The detection of multivariate outliers (anomalous observations) by Mahalanobis distance calculation was carried out on the surface rock geochemical data. The robust Mahalanobis distances computed from MVE estimates of location and scatter shows little variation over background areas but are sharply enhanced over mineralization. In contrast, the usual Mahalanobis distances either fail to indicate the presence of mineralization altogether, or, at best, respond with feebly enhanced values that do not satisfactorily indicate the presence of mineralization. Graphical display of results from classical RQ-PCA performs poorly, revealing only 6 weakly anomalous observations related to mineral occurrences. Several additional observations from these occurrences have also gone undetected. On the other hand, results from MVE-robust RQ-mode principal component analysis show that the background observations cluster tightly within the 95% tolerance ellipse while the anomalous observations (related to mineral occurrences) are greatly enhanced and the variables that characterize them are clearly indicated. Results are consistent with those of robust Mahalanobis distance procedure; both techniques indicate essentially the same observations as being anomalous.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.