Abstract

The rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicles is a challenge for applied research. Many technologies are developed and then researcher are looking up for their application in different sectors. Therefore, we decided to verify the use of the unmanned aerial vehicle for wood chips pile monitoring. <br><br> We compared the use of GNSS device and unmanned aerial vehicle for volume estimation of four wood chips piles. We used DJI Phantom 3 Professional with the built-in camera and GNSS device (geoexplorer 6000). We used Agisoft photoscan for processing photos and ArcGIS for processing points. <br><br> Volumes calculated from pictures were not statistically significantly different from amounts calculated from GNSS data and high correlation between them was found (p = 0.9993). We conclude that the use of unmanned aerial vehicle instead of the GNSS device does not lead to significantly different results. Tthe data collection consumed from almost 12 to 20 times less time with the use of UAV. Additionally, UAV provides documentation trough orthomosaic.

Highlights

  • Nowadays is no longer need to emphasize huge development in the unmanned aerial vehicle sector

  • The volume calculated from the points of GNSS device was lower on average 10.4% (356.5 m3) than the volume calculated from the UAV photos

  • Lowest relative difference was on a pile on open storage without any walls

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nowadays is no longer need to emphasize huge development in the unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) sector. There is a plenty type of drones from nano (< 5 kg) to large (> 200 kg) if we are comparing it based on the weight (Anderson and Gaston 2013). Crucial is the way how drones take-off and land. We can distinguish them to two key categories: horizontal take-off (fixed wing) and vertical take-off (rotary-wing) drones (Tang and Shao, 2015). There are many possible ways how to divide drones to categories (Blyenburgh, 2014). It is very helpful for decision making when we considering drone usage for a project

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call