Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes public responses to the murder trials of Edith Maxwell in 1935–1936. Discourses surrounding the case largely relied on stereotypical views of Appalachia to frame the case and the larger issues of domestic violence and gender-exclusionary jury laws. Edith Maxwell was a young teacher from a small town in Appalachian Virginia tried for the murder of her father, who she claimed was abusive. Using newspaper coverage, petitions for pardon, and materials circulated by the National Woman’s Party (NWP) in support of Maxwell, the article demonstrates that each group used Appalachian stereotypes to displace the problem of domestic violence onto the region. Ultimately, this displacement allowed for Maxwell’s pardon. However, the persistent focus on Appalachia resulted in a failure of the case to induce more lasting legal change concerning domestic violence and gender-exclusionary jury laws.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.