Abstract
Social media advertisers often use visuals in their ads to capture their audience’s attention. Walter and Gioglio (2014) find that social media directly reduces the audience’s attention span, which they call the new commodity. In this context, visuals are our new currency. However, the subject of visual grammar theories has not been fully examined in relation to the design of advertising messages found in social media. During the 2016 US presidential election, social media conveyed the two leading candidates’ messages. We conduct a comparative analysis to evaluate two leading visual grammar theories, those of Kress and van Leeuwen (2002) and Wilkinson (1999), and report that Kress and van Leeuwen’s theory leads to a better in-depth analysis of the visual messages found in two political ads from the U.S. presidential race of 2016.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.