Abstract
Well before gated communities began growing in the United States, many suburban municipalities could, and did, restrict who could live in them by using their zoning and land use powers. For example, requiring large minimum lot sizes and not allowing any multi-family housing made it impossible for lower-income people, who are disproportionately black, to reside in their community. These and other “exclusionary zoning” techniques have continued to be used by many suburbs to create non-visible, but highly effective, gates and walls to “protect” their middle and upper-middle class white residents from having “undesirable” people living near them. They have, thus, contributed greatly to the pattern of racial and economic segregation that has been found in most metropolitan areas in the United States since the mid-1960s. Since the late-1960s, civil rights activists have challenged such zoning regulations as discriminatory in a number of court cases with mixed results. The first effort to “open up the suburbs” via enacting a state law aimed at overcoming the effects of “snob zoning” was made in Massachusetts in 1969. Since then, civil rights and affordable housing activists in several other states have used this legislation as a model and have gotten similar “anti-snob zoning” laws passed by their legislatures. The Massachusetts statute, its impact on the supply and geography of affordable housing in that state, the opposition it has encountered, and how and why its proponents have been able to prevent it from being repealed or seriously weakened are the focus of this chapter.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.