Abstract

The first three chapters get us clear about what basic certainty and what morality is. In these next two chapters I go on to develop a key distinction (put forth by Daniele Moyal-Sharrock) between different kinds of basic certainty, the local and the universal. I apply this distinction to basic moral certainty, in order to explain both the underlying unity and the sometimes interminable conflict between different moral systems. In exploring the universal side of the distinction, I defend two examples of basic moral certainties that must be held by all functioning moral agents. My examples are the belief (i) that some killings are wrong (K); and (ii) that some wrongs are more serious than others, or that there is some hierarchy between morally evaluable actions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.