Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of normativity accepted by Christian Enumerical Council and Local Council of IV–IX century and norms of Kyiv Rus canon law, in particular, the Prince Vladimir’s Charter and Prince Yaroslav’s Statute. The main attention is paid to the determination of the degree of Council decisions’ influence on designation and content of Prince’s documents as well as their common features and dis- tinctions.The author comes to the conclusion that the introduction of canonic law in Kyiv Rus has been made under the influence of Byzantine church canons. Nevertheless, the above mentioned process and the essence of Russian canons are characterized by certain diver- sity. Eastern Church canonic law has been formed from the «bottom» within the period of nearly millennium at various Universal and Local Councils by Holy fathers and based on different sources and published in various collected works. Kyiv Rus canonic law has oc- curred «from above», supported by simultaneous publishing of Charter and Statute by two Princes that determined the sphere of the church jurisdiction quite clearly and precisely. The church, immediately after its introduction, was recognized as a special live orderliness while it had appeared in Rome only by the fourth century of its existence. Despite the fact that Nomocanon provided for different kinds of church hierarchs’ punishment by anathema, excommunication, deprivation of dignity as the result of numerous offences, the Charter and Statute didn’t contain such norms as well as punishment by damnation. The latter contained much more lenient punishment and provided for various monetary penalty ad- equate gravity of the offence. Within the battle with crimes against faith and church, the struggle for the morality of marriage and family relations and the observance of general Christian morality rules were highly emphasized. The Charter and Statute didn’t concern dogmatic issues; crime and punishment, provided for by these documents, were character- ized by more peculiar specification and reflection of live realities. This way the church has influenced all legal aspects of Kyiv Rus society and formed original Russian canonic law. It manifested the Russian church deflection from the Greek one in its attitude towards modern secular society and state and formed the basis for its future development. In gen- eral the introduction of Christianity in Kyiv Rus meant the reception of the new Byzantine idea of law, which started to modernize all the aspects of society and state including po- litical, legal, spiritual, cultural, ethical ones.

Highlights

  • Здійснюється порівняльний аналіз ухваленої Вселенськими та Помісними соборами християнської церкви ІV–ІХ століть нормативності та норм церковного права Київської Русі, зокрема, Уставу князя Володимира та Статуту князя Яро­ слава

  • Ігнорування суспільством історичного православного фундаменту вітчизняної державності спрямовує його на деградацію та моральну руйнацію

  • Другу суттєву відмінність процесу виникнення канонічного права на першому етапі його розвитку у Римській імперії й упродовж 988–1054 рр. у Київській Русі складала форма започаткування церковних дисциплінарних правил

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Здійснюється порівняльний аналіз ухваленої Вселенськими та Помісними соборами християнської церкви ІV–ІХ століть нормативності та норм церковного права Київської Русі, зокрема, Уставу князя Володимира та Статуту князя Яро­ слава. Досліджуваний же період історії церковного права Київської Русі не сягає й одного століття, оскільки після її Хрещення у 988 р. Другу суттєву відмінність процесу виникнення канонічного права на першому етапі його розвитку у Римській імперії й упродовж 988–1054 рр.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.