Abstract
We experience various sensory stimuli every day. How does this integration occur? What are the inherent mechanisms in this integration? The “unity assumption” proposes a perceiver’s belief of unity in individual unisensory information to modulate the degree of multisensory integration. However, this has yet to be verified or quantified in the context of semantic emotion integration. In the present study, we investigate the ability of subjects to judge the intensities and degrees of similarity in faces and voices of two emotions (angry and happy). We found more similar stimulus intensities to be associated with stronger likelihoods of the face and voice being integrated. More interestingly, multisensory integration in emotion perception was observed to follow a Gaussian distribution as a function of the emotion intensity difference between the face and voice—the optimal cut-off at about 2.50 points difference on a 7-point Likert scale. This provides a quantitative estimation of the multisensory integration function in audio-visual semantic emotion perception with regards to stimulus intensity. Moreover, to investigate the variation of multisensory integration across the population, we examined the effects of personality and autistic traits of participants. Here, we found no correlation of autistic traits with unisensory processing in a nonclinical population. Our findings shed light on the current understanding of multisensory integration mechanisms.
Highlights
We aimed to address two questions in this study: (1) How similar would the emotional intensities of the face and voice be to meet the “unity assumption,” and how would this affect an individual’s audiovisual integration strategy? This question was addressed directly by asking if subjects perceived audiovisual stimuli to be similar in emotional intensity such that the face and voice were possibly coming from the same person
We investigated the criteria for multisensory integration through judgments of emotion from faces and voices at different intensities
There is an emotional effect in multisensory integration, with the Angry emotions observed to require more similar audiovisual intensities to form a “Unity” judgment as compared to the Happy emotions
Summary
We constantly experience stimuli from various sensory modalities in our environment. Only about half of children experience such illusory effects, with the other half experiencing auditory dominance in such audiovisual conflicts (McGurk and MacDonald, 1976; Robinson and Sloutsky, 2004) When such unimodal stimuli are weak in intensity or presented with poor signal-to-noise ratio, a strong audiovisual benefit—the principle of “inverse effectiveness” enhances perception of the weak signals through multisensory integration (Meredith and Stein, 1986; Angelaki et al, 2009; Stevenson and James, 2009; van de Rijt Luuk et al, 2019). Taken together, this raises the question: How weak of an intensity is needed to trigger inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
