Abstract
Based upon Monte Carlo experiments mimicking cross-sectional analysis, Long and Ervin (2000) have suggested the routine application of heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix (HCCM) estimators, irrespective of whether heteroscedasticity is detected or expected. In this paper the use of HCCM estimators is re-examined in the context of testing the unit root hypothesis. The properties of Dickey-Fuller tests based on alternative HCCM estimators are considered in the presence of innovation variance breaks and heteroscedasticity in the square root of a regressor variable. The results show that for variance breaks, size correction comes at the expense of dramatic reduction in power. When heteroscedasticity is related to the square root of the lagged level in a Dickey-Fuller regression, the test does not have nominal size when the covariance matrix is either conventional or heteroscedasticity consistent. Furthermore, when HCCM estimators are used, the resultant tests can be expected to possess very little power against the null in most practical applications. Throughout, the more favoured HCCM estimator is subject to the greatest loss in power.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.