Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine the in vivo and in vitro effects of metabolites of eicosapentaenoic acid on ovine luteal function. Injection of 750 μg methyl eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or methyl 12( R), 13( S)-dihydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid (12,13-diHEPE) into the ovarian artery of ewes on day 10 of the estrous cycle caused a reduction in serum concentrations of progesterone by 48 h post-treatment compared with levels of this steroid in arachidic acid-treated controls (p<0.005). Although mean serum concentrations of progesterone in methyl EPA-treated ewes during the remainder of the cycle did not differ from those in control ewes, levels in methyl 12,13-diHEPE-treated ewes remained significantly suppressed. Duration of the estrous cycle did not differ among treatment groups (p > 0.05), but more of the methyl 12,13-diHEPE-treated animals ( 3 5 ) had exhibited estrus within 3 days after injection than methyl EPA-treated ( 1 5 ) or control ewes ( 0 5 ). Slices of corpus luteum removed from ewes on day 10 of the estrous cycle were incubated with arachidic acid (controls), 12,13-diHEPE or docosatetraenoic acid (DTA). Regardless of fatty acid treatment, all tissues retained the ability to produce basal levels of progesterone during subsequent incubation. Luteal slices previously exposed to arachidic acid or DTA exhibited an increase in progesterone production in response to subsequent treatment with LH (p<0.05). In contrast, luteal slices incubated with 12,13-diHEPE did not respond to LH with a significant increase in production of this steroid above that observed in controls. All tissues displayed a marked increase in progesterone synthesis upon treatment with 8-Br-cAMP relative to incubation of tissue alone (p<0.001). Subcellular distribution of [ 14C]-12,13-diHEPE in luteal cells after incubation revealed that the majority of the fatty acid was associated with the plasma membrane. These data suggest that metabolites of eicosapentaenoic acid with hydroxyl groups on adjacent carbon atoms interfere with luteal function in the ewe, perhaps in part by altering luteal response to LH.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call