Abstract

Previous literature on high-variety manufacturing developed various control policies that include a ‘shift mechanism’ that changes the control priority during periods of low and peak demand. Embedded in priority rules or release methods, this shift mechanism is developed in a setting with a single capacity source, making the need to shift between control priorities necessary. However, when there are multiple capacity sources – for example, by identical parallel machines – we can use a ‘dual focus mechanism’, where each capacity source can have its unique control priority, regardless of demand levels. Using discrete event simulation, we find that the combination of shift and focus mechanisms leads to the best average performance. But this is at the expense of an extreme delay for orders with large process times, which can be prevented by a control policy that uses a dual focus mechanism only, whilst still realising competitive average performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.