Abstract
This article posits that attempts thus far to develop a consistent, principles theory of the duty of fair representation have not been successful. We do not deny that certain particularized rules of fairness derived from various sources can be generated and applied to particular cases. We do not think, however, that there is an intelligible general rule of distributive or procedural fairness that may be interposed by a court to overrule the discretionary decisions made by a union in bargaining for its constituents. This article examines the substantive theories of fairness that have been suggested by courts and commentators.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
