Abstract

For a polynomial with palindromic coefficients, unimodality is equivalent to having a nonnegative $g$-vector. A sufficient condition for unimodality is having a nonnegative $\gamma$-vector, though one can have negative entries in the $\gamma$-vector and still have a nonnegative $g$-vector.In this paper we provide combinatorial models for three families of $\gamma$-vectors that alternate in sign. In each case, the $\gamma$-vectors come from unimodal polynomials with straightforward combinatorial descriptions, but for which there is no straightforward combinatorial proof of unimodality. By using the transformation from $\gamma$-vector to $g$-vector, we express the entries of the $g$-vector combinatorially, but as an alternating sum. In the case of the $q$-analogue of $n!$, we use a sign-reversing involution to interpret the alternating sum, resulting in a manifestly positive formula for the $g$-vector. In other words, we give a combinatorial proof of unimodality. We consider this a "proof of concept" result that we hope can inspire a similar result for the other two cases, $\prod_{j=1}^n (1+q^j)$ and the $q$-binomial coefficient ${n\brack k}$.

Highlights

  • A sequence of numbers a1, a2, . . . is unimodal if it never increases after the first time it decreases, i.e., if for some index k we have a1 · · · ak−1 ak ak+1 · · · .the electronic journal of combinatorics 23(2) (2016), #P2.40Unimodality problems abound in algebraic, enumerative, and topological combinatorics

  • The γ-vectors come from unimodal polynomials with straightforward combinatorial descriptions, but for which there is no straightforward combinatorial proof of unimodality

  • The main purpose of this paper is to show that there are interesting families of unimodal sequences whose gamma vectors are not nonnegative, but alternate in sign

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A sequence of numbers a1, a2, . . . is unimodal if it never increases after the first time it decreases, i.e., if for some index k we have a1 · · · ak−1 ak ak+1 · · ·. Is the generating function for permutations according to the number of inversions, so a combinatorial explanation of unimodality can be given with a family of injections that take permutations with k − 1 inversions to permutations with k inversions. Such maps are implicit in the fact that there is a symmetric chain decomposition of the Bruhat order on the symmetric group [16, Section 7]. For the q-binomial coefficients, we have that n k counts lattice paths in a k × (n − k) box according to area below the path Despite this simple interpretation, a combinatorial proof of unimodality was elusive for a long time. We provide details of the other two cases in the hope that others can use this idea to give new, combinatorial proofs of unimodality

Two bases for palindromic polynomials
Ballot paths
Unimodality
A paradigm for proving unimodality
Three families of alternating gamma vectors
Fibonacci polynomials and the q-factorials
Lucas polynomials and partitions with distinct parts
Lucanomial coefficients and q-binomial coefficients
Combinatorial expressions for g-vectors
When g is the g-vector of n k
A new proof of unimodality for q-factorials
The harder cases
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.