Abstract
Trunk modification (TM) is associated with reduced knee adduction moment during gait in both healthy and symptomatic individuals. Reported reductions are dependent on the magnitude of modification implemented. Evidence however suggests that increased trunk motion augments structural loading at the spine. Despite the positive adaptations at the knee, potential unanticipated changes in spinal load are yet to be investigated. PURPOSE: To investigate changes in trunk joint reaction force (JRF) during ipsilateral (IP) and contralateral (CT) stance phases subsequent to implementing unilateral subject-specific TM. METHODS: 19 healthy participants (26.7±4.8 years; 1.69±0.17 m; 72.3±11.8 kg) were recruited. Trunk lean was implemented towards the side of the preferred kicking limb. Participants average trunk angle (TA) was assessed during 10 baseline trials using a motion capture system (200Hz) and force plates (1000Hz). Subject-specific TA range was determined by adding 1-3 standard deviations (small), and 3-5 standard deviations (large) to baseline value. Participants completed 5 trials using both small and large subject-specific TM angles. Real-time TA projected as a line graph which was visible to participants during TM trials reinforced performance. Visual 3D was used to deliver feedback and determine trunk JRF (N/kg). Changes to trunk JRF was assessed using a Friedman test with Wilcoxon signed-ranked test and Bonferroni-adjusted significance level. Analyses were conducted using a significance level of p<0.017. RESULTS: Peak lateral JRF during IP and CT stance were significantly greater during TM trials (χ2 (2) = 32.9, and 30.7, p<0.001 respectively). Participants experienced increased lateral JRF during both IP (d=1.5, and d=1.7, small and large TM respectively), and CT (d=1.6, and d=1.7, small and large TM respectively) compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Changes in trunk JRFs are indicative of elevated spinal loads. During CT stance, lateral JRF in the direction of the modified side persisted which is indicative of continued asymmetric trunk load. Findings suggest TM could result in detrimental adaptations and may be contraindicated for certain individuals. Further research employing longitudinal design is needed to investigate if observed acute changes are transient in nature.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.