Abstract

BackgroundVentilated patients with asymmetry of lung or chest wall mechanics may be vulnerable to differing lung stresses or strains dependent on body position. Our purpose was to examine transpulmonary pressure (PTP) and end-expiratory lung volume (functional residual capacity (FRC)) during body positioning changes in an animal model under the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or experimental pleural effusion (PLEF).MethodsFourteen deeply anesthetized swine were studied including tracheostomy, thoracostomy, and esophageal catheter placement. Animals were ventilated at VT = 10 ml/kg, frequency of 15, I/E = 1:2, and FIO2 = 0.5. The animals were randomized to supine, prone, right lateral, left lateral, and semi-Fowler positions with a PEEP of 1 cm H2O (PEEP1) or a PEEP of 10 cm H2O (PEEP10) applied. Experimental PLEF was generated by 10 ml/kg saline instilled into either pleural space. PTP and FRC were determined in each condition.ResultsNo significant differences in FRC were found among the four horizontal positions. Compared to horizontal positioning, semi-Fowler's increased FRC (p < 0.001) by 56% at PEEP1 and 54% at PEEP10 without PLEF and by 131% at PEEP1 and 98% at PEEP10 with PLEF. Inspiratory or expiratory PTP showed insignificant differences across positions at both levels of PEEP. Consistently negative end-expiratory PTP at PEEP1 increased to positive values with PEEP10.ConclusionsFRC did not differ among horizontal positions; however, semi-Fowler's positioning significantly raised FRC. PTP proved insensitive to mechanical asymmetry. While end-expiratory PTP was negative at PEEP1, applying PEEP10 caused a transition to positive PTP, suggestive of reopening of initially compressed lung units.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2197-425X-2-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Ventilated patients with asymmetry of lung or chest wall mechanics may be vulnerable to differing lung stresses or strains dependent on body position

  • For non-pleural effusion (PLEF)-PEEP of 1 cm H2O (PEEP1), functional residual capacity (FRC) was significantly increased with semi-Fowler positioning compared to each of the horizontal positions (p < 0.001)

  • Among all positions without PLEF, PEEP of 10 cm H2O (PEEP10) caused a mean FRC increase of 389 ± 170 ml or 79% compared to PEEP1 FRC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ventilated patients with asymmetry of lung or chest wall mechanics may be vulnerable to differing lung stresses or strains dependent on body position. Transpulmonary pressure (PTP) - estimated as the difference between airway pressure (PAW) and esophageal pressure (PES) - has been advocated as more physiologically relevant for evaluating the mechanical properties of the lung and chest wall [1,2,3,4,5]. Absolute values and dynamic tidal changes of PES have been examined in the setting of healthy or symmetrically diseased lungs [1,2]. Those evaluations have shown that the esophageal balloon catheter reliably measures the pressures that surround its immediate environment. Our purpose was to examine the reliability of PTP for characterizing total lung volume changes due to body positioning when the mechanical properties of the thorax are symmetrically and nonsymmetrically distributed

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call