Abstract
The question of deriving general force/flux relationships that apply out of the linear response regime is a central topic of theories for nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. This work applies an information theory perspective to compute approximate force/flux relations and compares the result with traditional alternatives. If it can be said that there is a consensus on the form of response theories in driven, nonequilibrium transient dynamics, then that consensus is consistent with maximizing the entropy of a distribution over transition space. This agreement requires the problem of force/flux relationships to be described entirely in terms of such transition distributions, rather than steady-state properties (such as near-equilibrium works) or distributions over trajectory space (such as maximum caliber). Within the transition space paradigm, it is actually simpler to work in the fully nonlinear regime without relying on any assumptions about the steady-state or long-time properties. Our results are compared to extensive numerical simulations of two very different systems. The first is the periodic Lorentz gas under constant external force, extended with angular velocity and physically realistic inelastic scattering. There, we compare predicted and simulated distributions of the cumulative horizontal displacement after falling through 10 rows of fixed scatterers. The second is an -Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou (FPUT) chain, extended with a Langevin thermostat that couples to just two of its harmonic modes. This system tests whether the known long-time correlations in the FPUT system alter the properties of cumulative heat conduction away from the maximum entropy prediction. Although both systems are simulated for short, fixed times under physically realistic dynamical models, the maximum entropy structure of the time-integrated flows are clearly evident. The result encourages further development of empirical laws for nonequilibrium statistical mechanics by employing analogies with standard maximum entropy techniques—even in cases where large deviation principles cannot be rigorously proven from an underlying model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.