Abstract

Despite the widespread use of the delay discounting task in clinical and non-clinical contexts, several task versions are available in the literature, making it hard to compare results across studies. Moreover, normative data are not available to evaluate individual performances. The present study aims to propose a unified version of the delay discounting task based on monetary rewards and it provides normative values built on an Italian sample of 357 healthy participants. The most used parameters in the literature to assess the delay discount rate were compared to find the most valid index to discriminate between normative data and a clinical population who typically present impulsivity issues, i.e., patients with a lesion to the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC). In line with our hypothesis, mOFC patients showed higher delay discounting scores than the normative sample and the normative group. Based on this evidence, we propose that the task and indexes here provided can be used to identify extremely high (above the 90th percentile for hyperbolic k or below the 10th percentile for AUC) or low (below the 10th percentile for hyperbolic k or above the 90th percentile for AUC) delay discounting performances. The complete dataset, the R code used to perform all analyses, a free and modifiable version of the delay discounting task, as well as the R code that can be used to extract all indexes from such tasks and compare subjective performances with the normative data here presented are available as online materials.

Highlights

  • Delay of gratification comprises a set of motivational and cognitive mechanisms that lead to larger later rewards as compared to immediate or closer rewards [1,2,3]

  • The present study aims to fill this gap by proposing a version of the delay discounting task based on monetary reward and providing percentile equivalents from an Italian sample of 357 healthy participants, stratified by sex, age, and education

  • We propose that the task and the normative data presented in this paper can be used to identify extremely high or low delay discounting performances

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Delay of gratification comprises a set of motivational and cognitive mechanisms that lead to larger later rewards as compared to immediate or closer rewards [1,2,3]. In this sense, it is intended as a form of regulatory process that involves the ability to control actions and feelings and the implementation of self-control strategies, which are necessary for the execution of difficult-to-achieve intentions [1,4]. Delay discounting indicates a tendency to prefer smaller sooner rewards to larger delayed ones [6,7,8,9,10]. Delay discounting indicates the tendency to diminish the subjective value of a reward as a

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call