Abstract

In this study, we address the long-standing issue—arising prominently from conceptual density functional theory (CDFT)—of the relative importance of electrostatic, i.e., “hard–hard”, versus spin-pairing, i.e., “soft–soft”, interactions in determining regiochemical preferences. We do so from a valence bond (VB) perspective and demonstrate that VB theory readily enables a clear-cut resolution of both of these contributions to the bond formation/breaking process. Our calculations indicate that appropriate local reactivity descriptors can be used to gauge the magnitude of both interactions individually, e.g., Fukui functions or HOMO/LUMO orbitals for the spin-pairing/(frontier) orbital interactions and molecular electrostatic potentials (and/or partial charges) for the electrostatic interactions. In contrast to previous reports, we find that protonation reactions cannot generally be classified as either charge- or frontier orbital-controlled; instead, our results indicate that these two bonding contributions generally interplay in more subtle patterns, only giving the impression of a clear-cut dichotomy. Finally, we demonstrate that important covalent, i.e., spin pairing, reactivity modes can be missed when only a single spin-pairing/orbital interaction descriptor is considered. This study constitutes an important step in the unification of CDFT and VB theory.

Highlights

  • The systematic and reliable prediction of regioselective preferences associated with chemical reactions remains an outstanding challenge in computational chemistry.[1−5] Molecules often contain a multitude of potentially reactive sites, so that manual investigation of the relative energetics of each individual transition and product state, associated with a pair of reaction partners, quickly becomes unfeasible as the size of the investigated system increases

  • In valence bond (VB) theory, the electronic wave function associated with a chemical system is represented as a superposition of

  • Focusing on a selection of protonation reactions, we demonstrated that these two interaction types contributing to chemical bonding can be readily resolved with the help of VB theory

Read more

Summary

■ INTRODUCTION

The systematic and reliable prediction of regioselective preferences associated with chemical reactions remains an outstanding challenge in computational chemistry.[1−5] Molecules often contain a multitude of potentially reactive sites, so that manual investigation of the relative energetics of each individual transition and product state, associated with a pair of reaction partners, quickly becomes unfeasible as the size of the investigated system increases. Most general-purpose reactivity descriptors proposed so far can roughly speaking be classified into one of two main classes: the descriptor focuses on either so-called “hard−hard” or “soft−soft” interactions This dichotomous approach (which emerges, among others, from the Klopman−Salem equation[14] and constitutes a cornerstone of the “hard−soft acid base” (HSAB) principle,[15,16] embedded within the conceptual density functional theory (CDFT) framework17−21) has been demonstrated to work reasonably well in the limiting situations of either charge-controlled reactivity, i.e., reactions leading to formation of a purely ionic bond, or (frontier) orbital-controlled reactivity, i.e., reactions leading to formation of a purely covalent bond. The energy spacings between the HL and the ionic structures in the dissociation limit were corrected by the deviation from the corresponding DFT values (calculated at (U)B3LYP/6-31++G***//(U)B3LYP/def2-TZVP)

■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■ CONCLUSIONS
■ REFERENCES
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call