Abstract

Although manufacturers recommend varying infusion rates for differing intravenous immunoglobulin products (IVIg), there may be improved efficiency and reduced potential for error with the application of a single infusion policy for all IVIg products. During the transition from a 6% to a 10% IVIg, we prospectively evaluated patient reported adverse reactions to IVIg with the 10% product (Intragam 10) given at a rate faster than recommended by the manufacturer. While there was a significant increase in the rate of immediate infusion reactions when compared with the previous IVIg preparation (Intragam P), there was no increase in the rate of reactions post infusion. The rate of reactions was within previously reported expectations for other IVIg products. All reactions were minor, requiring no or minimal intervention and few impacted significantly on the quality of life. Despite an active haemovigilance program, minor adverse reactions were generally not reported. Our results suggest that a fast single rate of IVIg infusion is safe, and may minimise patient attendance and hospital resources with acceptable safety. In implementing a strategy to increase IVIg infusion rates an active process to monitor safety is preferred over standard haemovigiliance or pharmacovigilance processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.